| |
|
SSC
Working group on Factor VIII and Factor IX, Rare Bleeding
Disorders (RBDs)
|
|
1st
July, 2006, Oslo, Norway
|
| |
|
Chair: K. Mertens (The
Netherlands)
Co-chairs: J.C. Gill (USA), C. Lee (UK), J. Oldenburg (Germany),
F. Peyvandi (Italy), J.M. Saint-Remy (Belgium), A. Srivastava
(India), H.M. van den Berg (The Netherlands)
|
| |
| The Chairman opened the Subcommittee
meeting at 14.15 for an audience of approximately 170 attendants.
He announced a few amendments to the final program and provided
the timing details of the various sections in the agenda. |
| |
|
ISTH-SSC
Working Party on RARE BLEEDING DISORDERS (RBDs)
Co-chairs: F. Peyvandi (Italy), C. Lee (UK)
|
| RBDD project: state of the
art |
| F. Peyvandi (Italy) |
| |
|
| In
2004, a SSC working group on "Rare Bleeding Disorders"
was established with these summarised first aims of the project: |
| |
|
| |
·
Database development: Identify current databases and potential
collaborators world-wide, Perfect database tools and data
collection protocols and disseminate them worldwide, Develop
a steering committee for data evaluation |
| |
·
Product development licensure: Perfect common regulatory requirements
within FDA/EMEA, Identify products already available, Design
clinical trials in order to get global licensing, To explore
new product development (FV), To implement post-licensing
surveillance |
| -
A report on the Steering committee held in Vancouver (WFH,
May 2006) was made: |
| |
·
presentation of different National databases: WFH, Swiss,
North American, UK, French, Egyptian, Iranian and Indian |
| |
·
RBDs distribution according to these registries and RBDD.
Since 2004, 58 centres from all over the world joined the
International Database of Rare Bleeding Disorder (RBDD) by
including data on 2665 patients. Preliminary information on
distribution of affected patients in the world and the available
treatment for them are reported at www.rbdd.org. |
| -
The future RBDD plan after Vancouver meeting were discussed: |
| |
·
to design a specific and homogeneous questionnaire reviewed
by experts in the field of RBDs to be used as a specific data
collection tool by a majority of the countries around the
world. This will contain the most important clinical and therapeutic
data useful to answer the missing information that remains
unanswered in the field of RBDs |
| |
· to form subcommittees for each deficiency in order
to review literature, to plan multicenter studies, to prepare
evidence-based guidelines using data collected in either RBDD
or other available National Registries, to develop a specific
part of the website/RBDD that addressed these disorders, to
develop a clinical research agenda for these disorders |
| |
|
| RBDs
in the USA (US working group on RBDs) |
|
A.
Shapiro (USA)
|
| |
|
| The
rare bleeding disorder group in the United States will be
developing a resource center hosted on-line by the National
Hemophilia Foundation that will contain information on many
rare plasma protein deficiencies. Links to existing websites,
registries, and organizations related to these disorders will
be included. The material developed for this resource center
will be submitted for publication. In addition, the development
of a national database in the United States is presently underway
and a uniform platform has been adopted. Development of a
database for rare bleeding disorders will be included in this
national database effort. The rare bleeding disorder group
in the US wishes to collaborate on an international level
to further both development of international data collection
and research efforts, including expansion of treatment options. |
| |
|
| Glanzmann
thrombasthenia: World distribution, mutations and founder
effects |
|
U.
Seligsohn (Israel)
|
| |
|
| A
preliminary survey was performed in order to estimate the
minimal prevalence of the disease in different populations,
the mutations so far detected and founder effects. Data were
extracted from reports involving ³9 unrelated patients,
national and reference center registries, a database of mutations
(by Debra French and Alan Nurden) or personal communications.
|
| |
|
| |
|
Table:
minimal prevalence of Glanzmann thrombasthenia
|
|
Country
|
n
|
Minimal
prevalence
|
| Jordan |
73
|
1:81.000
|
| Israel |
70
|
1:143.000
|
| Iran
(Shiraz) (Tehran) |
23
|
1:170.000
|
|
382
|
| Tunisia |
22
|
1:256.000
|
|
17
|
| Oman |
9
|
1:340.000
|
| S.A. |
30
|
1:880.000
|
| UK |
85
|
1:706.000
|
| Japan |
192
|
1:664.000
|
| India
(Vellore) |
254
|
?
|
|
20
|
|
30
|
|
75
|
| France |
64
|
1:192.000
|
|
| |
| The
minimal prevalence ranged from 1:80,000 in Jordanian, 1:143,000
in Israelis and Palestinians to 1:2,800,000 in Indians, with
an average global prevalence of 1:1.1x106. |
| -
As of May 2006, 159 mutations have been reported in peer-reviewed
journals: |
| |
·
159 published (69 b3, 90 aIIb)
· 133 described in individuals
· 26 in more than one individuals |
For
7 of the 26 mutations, a founder effect was discerned by haplotype
analysis: 2 in Iraqi Jews, 1 in Palestinians, 1 in Jordanians,
2 in Indians and 1 in Manouce Gypsies in France.
This preliminary survey is a rough estimate of the global
problem related to this severe hemostatic abnormality, but
is somewhat limited because of lack of data from China, Africa,
Latin America, Eastern Europe and densely populated countries
like Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc. |
| |
| Menorrhagia
in women affected by RBDs. Proposal of an International study |
|
F.
Peyvandi (Italy)
|
|
|
| -
A significant number of women affected by blood coagulation
diseases present with Bleeding risk during reproductive life: |
| |
·
Menorrhagia: defined as menses > 7 days
· Pregnancy
· Perinatal
· Post-partum |
-
On 261 severe RBDs women (retrospective study), menorrhagia
occurred in >50% of the patients
- In an Italian study with 119 patients affected by RBDs (34%),
mostly FXI and FVII, VWD (40%) and Hemophilia carriers (26%): |
| |
·
Menorrhagia was present in 45% RBDs, 55% carriers of hemophilia
and 46% in VWD
· Bleeding during pregnancy was present in 30% RBDs
and 8% of VWD. This symptom was absent in carriers of haemophilia
· Post-partum bleeding present in 45% RBDs, 38% carriers
of hemophilia and 42% of VWD |
Previous
studies on this issue are not very informative due to the
heterogeneous group of patients enrolled and the different
methodologies used to analyze the data. We therefore propose
a multicentre prospective study (10-15 International Centers)
which enrol a large number of female patients affected by
vWD, rare bleeding disorders and carriers of hemophilia (500-600
patients and controls). Based on a specific questionnaire
designed to collect clinical data in a homogeneous format.
In future it could be available online (www.rbdd.org) for
the participating centers.
The results obtained will be examined by a scientific committee
and then published on the space assigned to on-line studies
within the URL: www.rbdd.org. The results of this project
will provide information on the incidence of bleeding complications
and to assess whether hormone therapy, anti-fibrinolytic and
replacement therapy could have beneficial effects on bleeding
symptoms and on quality of life of these patients. |
| |
|
| Long
term prophylaxis in afibrinogenemic patients: a rationale
based on results from single dose PK |
|
T.
Waegemans (France)
|
|
|
FIBRINOGENE
T-I (LFB) is a new concentrate of human plasma fibrinogen.
It is derived from cryoprecipitate and its manufacturing process
includes three major biological safety steps. A single dose
PK study performed in 5 afibrinogenemic patients showed homogeneous
results within a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with
IV infusion and first order elimination. This model was applied
to simulate PK profiles at steady-state after repeated infusions.
A selection of targeted parameters will allow investigators
to determine individualized dosage regimens before initiating
a long term prophylaxis in afibrinogenemic patients. A design
of PK study was presented, aiming at comparing the values
predicted by the simulation with those observed during the
prospective follow-up of patients.
- Presented study: |
| |
·
Multicenter
· Multinational, non comparative
· PK study
· 10-15 patients
· primary end-point: document PK and develop prophylactic
dose
· secondary end-point: safety and efficacy |
| |
|
| Getting
products to patients: industry options |
|
J.
Lloyd (UK)
|
| |
| 2
years ago, BPL identified market access, regulatory requirement
and clinical trial design as constraints to manufacturing
products for RBD. |
| |
·
Market access: need to have patients number and treatment
regimen |
| |
·
Regulatory: existence of multiple dossiers because of
1. different countries mean different regulation
2. multiple trials in different countries
3. provide language to local country (product labelling)
4. many countries and small number of patients (not practical)
Can have orphan drug designation? What to do?
One common dossier? One trial? |
| |
·
Clinical trials, are difficult because of:
1. few patients
2. different sight for children
3. cross over - what product costs |
Over
the past two years there have been some advances made. Registries
and databases of rare bleeding disorders have made it easier
to establish patient numbers and treatment regimes to support
orphan drug designation. Further development and support of
these registries is required to aid industry in deciding whether
to develop a product. Orphan drug designation and the parallel
scientific advice available from the FDA and EMEA have potentially
reduced the need for multiple dossiers and trials. Clinical
trial design and support remains an issue, which is overcome
by protocol assistance from regulators. There are still some
major hurdles for industry to overcome.
Further ongoing cooperation between regulatory agencies is
required. The maintenance of parallel scientific advice provided
by the EMEA and FDA is vital. |
| |
|
| General
discussion and concluding remarks |
|
| In
the discussion Dr. Peyvandi raised the issue how to proceed
with the Rare Bleeding Disorders now her outside funding for
this project expires. The Chairman indicated that SSC activities
in general would benefit from some level of funding by ISTH.
This particularly includes Working Groups or Working Parties
that have formally been endorsed by SSC. This issue was discussed
in more detail in the audience. It was believed that ISTH,
by virtue of its established authority, could drive related
national or regional projects under the same umbrella. The
general feeling was that ISTH could show leadership in providing
funding for those SSC activities that are considered to have
appropriate priority. The Chairman mentioned that this issue
has been brought to the attention of the SSC Chairman. He
concluded the meeting thanking all speakers for their presentations
and the audience for attending and contributing to the discussions. |
| |
|